On June 29, 2010, the Senate voted to commence debate on the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act of 2010, a bill passed by the House on June 17, 2010 which includes a $30 billion fund for small business lending through the provision of capital to community banks. This legislation would implement the program described in President Obama’s State of the Union address earlier this year. Obama has promoted the program by saying that it “takes money repaid by Wall Street banks to provide capital for community banks on Main Street” that can in turn help small businesses create jobs. In the latest version of the bill presented to the Senate, certain banks with less than $10 billion in assets would be eligible for government infusions of capital, dividend payments on which would decrease with increasing levels of small business lending. Banks are also generally permitted to use this capital to refinance existing TARP obligations. The substitute amendment currently before the Senate cuts out a provision of the House bill to permit eligible banks to amortize recent real estate loan losses over as many as 10 years.
The original Obama proposal called on Congress to transfer TARP money to create the fund, but the fund has evolved as a completely separate initiative. Acknowledging this possible confusion, Section 3111(a) of the bill specifically provides that the fund “is established as separate and distinct from the Troubled Asset Relief Program established by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008” and that an institution “shall not, by virtue of a capital investment under the Small Business Lending Fund Program, be considered a recipient of the Troubled Asset Relief Program.” Proponents continue the political battle to detach this potentially negative association from a bill that would target recovery on Main Street.
The Small Business Lending Fund
Title III of the bill currently before the Senate establishes the fund and authorizes the government to make up to $30 billion in capital investments into eligible institutions. These investments would be similar to TARP infusions but would not result in executive compensation and other restrictions. Banks up to $10 billion in assets would generally be eligible to apply for funding. However, the Small Business Lending Fund will not be a source of capital for the banks most in need of additional capital. Banks on the FDIC’s Troubled Bank List (generally those with composite CAMELS ratings of 4 or 5) would be ineligible to participate. As with the Capital Purchase Program, the program is designed to provide assistance to otherwise healthy institutions. Each institution’s primary federal banking regulator will continue to have a significant say in whether the institution should receive any funds under the Small Business Lending Fund.
(more…)
On February 3, 2010, the Treasury Department announced enhancements to the TARP Capital Purchase Program for Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs). In addition to significant improvements for CDFIs, for the first time the Treasury Department has formally announced that it will consider private matching investments to determine bank viability – which could be a significant signal of how the Treasury might treat community banks under the proposed $30 billion Small Business Lending Fund.
Basic Program Terms
- CDFI’s can apply for capital equal to up to 5 percent of their total risk weighted assets.
- The dividend rate on the preferred stock will be 2% for eight years (as opposed to 5% for five years under the original Capital Purchase Program) before increasing to 9%.
- CDFI’s with existing TARP Capital Purchase Program investments will be eligible to transfer those investments into this program (effectively lowering the carrying costs of the capital and potentially providing additional capital, if desired).
- Consistent with the previous terms for CDFI’s, CDFI’s will not be required to issue any warrants or other additional equity kickers to the Treasury Department under the program.
Matching Capital
As noted above, for the first time the Treasury Department has formally recognized the possibility of institutions raising matching private capital to become eligible for TARP capital. Specifically, the new plan contemplates that if a CDFI might not otherwise be approved by its regulator, it will be eligible to participate “so long as it can raise enough private capital that – when matched with the Treasury capital up to 5 percent of risk-weighted assets – it can reach viability.” The new private capital will have to be junior to the TARP investment (i.e. common stock or preferred stock with lower preferences – although potentially higher dividend rates – than the TARP preferred stock).
(more…)
Carrying through with his announcement in the State of the Union, on February 2, 2010, President Obama provided the outlines of a proposed $30 billion Small Business Lending Fund to provide capital to community banks, with incentives to increase small business lending. As proposed, the program will require Congressional approval to move the funds outside of TARP, which should remove the applicability of the executive compensation and governance restrictions and is also hoped to remove the stigma associated with TARP funds.
Based on the initial fact sheet, the terms appear generally comparable to the financial terms under the Capital Purchase Program, with reductions in the dividend rate for the first five years triggered by increases in small business lending. Every 2.5% increase in small business lending through December 31, 2011 over 2009 levels would trigger a 1% decrease in dividend rate, down to a minimum rate of 1%.
Banks with less than $1 billion in assets would be eligible to receive a capital investment of up to 5% of their risk-weighted assets. Banks with between $1 and $10 billion in assets would be eligible to receive a capital investment of up to 3% of their risk-weighted assets. Participation in the program will require approval by the bank’s primary federal regulator, although no details are available as to the standards that will be employed.
(more…)
Regulators Issue Statement on Lending to Creditworthy Small Businesses
On February 5, 2010, the federal banking regulators and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors issued an Interagency Statement on the Credit Needs of Creditworthy Small Business Borrowers. The Statement builds upon principles set forth in the October 2009 Policy Statement on Prudent Commercial Real Estate Loan Workouts. After noting the overall decline in loans to small businesses and the reasons for that decline the regulators suggested that lenders may have become overly cautious with respect to small business lending. They encourage lenders to engage in prudent small business lending and that that examiners will not criticize lenders for working in prudent and constructive manner with small businesses.
The decline in small business lending has many reasons, not the least of which is that loan demand is actually down. Lenders are also naturally cautious of lending to those businesses that are reliant solely on cash flow that has slowed due to the slowdown in consumer spending and the decline ion the personal wealth of the owners of the businesses. Despite the assertions to the contrary by the regulators, lenders are concerned that there is a disconnect between statements from Washington, DC and what actually happens in the field when examiners are onsite at financial institutions. Our experience seems to show that local federal regulators do not see any upside in being flexible when faced with making decisions about how to rate credits. Lenders are therefore naturally reluctant to maker decisions based on guidance until they see it actually implemented on the ground.